Archive for the ‘Blogger Jobs’ Category:


Live blog: Sister recalls finding Michelle Young

NBC17.com will blog live throughout the Jason Young trial. Young is accused of murdering his pregnant wife, Michelle, in their Raleigh home in 2006. The first jury could not reach a decision in June.

The Jason Young re-trial opened Monday in Wake County Superior Court with the prosecution suggesting Young’s testimony could not be trusted. The defense, however, responded that the facts show Young did not commit the crime.

In the previous trial, Young took the stand at the last minute, and prosecutor Becky Holt appeared surprised to see him testify. Holt pressed Young on his version of what happened, but Young was ready to parry her efforts.

This time, though, Holt was prepared, and she reminded the jury he had 1,693 days to give his side of the story before finally taking the stand.

Holt emphasized that the Youngs had a difficult marriage, in part because of their different personalities.

“She was the planner, the organizer, the type-A personality, the hard worker, the one who strove in her job to meet jobs, the accountant — the sometimes uptight personality,” Holt said.

“He was the free spirit, the adventure lover; irresponsible, immature, the life of a party, the jokester, the salesman.”

Holt emphasized salesman, an obvious push to get the jury to question what he might say if he takes the stand again.

But defense attorney Mike Klinkosum, in a methodical attack that followed, emphasized that Young did not commit the crime in November 2006. Klinkosum acknowledge that Young could be “a jerk” but said the facts did not support a conviction.

“We don’t convict people of murder because they sometimes act like jerks,” Klinkosum said.

The two attorneys, with months to prepare, gave thorough, detailed descriptions of their lines of attack.

Holt, again appealing to the emotion of the jury, brought Michelle’s sister, Meredith, to the stand to describe the relationship between Jason and Michelle – which was rocky – and detail what Meredith saw the day she found Michelle’s body in their Raleigh home.

But unlike the first trial, the emotion from Meredith was less raw. She dabbed at her eyes during the difficult parts of the testimony, especially recalling the day she found Michelle and the surreal scene of finding her niece there with her mother’s bloody body.

The brutality of the day was evident in the 911 call, which prosecutors replayed.

“She’s cold,” you can hear her say. “Her body is stiff. Oh my god.”

Live blog from Monday’s testimony:

4:30 p.m.: Meredith Fisher listened while they replayed the 911 call from when she found her sister, and you can feel the savage nature of the attack in the call.

“Is she breathing?” the dispatcher asked.

“I don’t think so. Michelle?” Meredith said. 

“She’s cold.

She rolled Michelle over and said, “Oh my god. … I really think she’s dead.” 

The dispatcher told her to try to roll Michelle on her back to administer CPR, but Meredith said, ”She’s cold. Her body is stiff. Oh my god.”

The dispatcher asked Meredith to take Cassidy outside, and she did.

Meredith Fisher just finished her testimony. Anthony Scott Hughes, with EMS, is now testifying.

4:19 p.m.: Meredith Fisher is describing entering the house the day after Michelle was killed. She saw Michelle’s pocket book and called out for her after entering the back. 

But she didn’t hear a response and headed upstairs. She a maroon color, assumed the child had gotten into Michelle’s hairspray. She had no idea at first it was blood.

“I looked to the left and that’s when I saw Michelle on the floor,” she said.

Obviously, the testimony is difficult and emotional, but Meredith has been much less shaken this time on the stand. 

3:25 p.m.: Jason and Michelle Young had a difficult marriage, as described by Michelle’s sister, Meredith.

Meredith had moved to North Carolina to help with the couple’s child, Cassidy, and she often wound up talking to the two about their problems.

“A little fight would turn into the silent treatment for days,” Meredith said on the stand Monday. “They didn’t know how to fight at all. They didn’t know how to get along. I can think of waaaaay more times they fought than they got along.

“Pick an issue … It was always something.”

Meredith said a key problem was how they disagreed on Michelle’s mother, Linda Fisher. Jason and Linda did not get along, and Jason did not want Linda to spend long amounts of time at their home over the holidays in 2006.

“Jason wanted to put a cap on how long my mom was allowed to stay at the house,” Meredith said. 

“He wanted her to stay at a hotel. And Michelle didn’t want that.”

Meredith said that in discussions with Jason and Michelle, Michelle’s concerns focused on having better communication, Jason being more responsible and being together as a family.

“She wanted to be more family-oriented,” Meredith said.

“His main concern was my mom and their lack of sex in the marriage.”

But Meredith recalled Michelle saying Jason was more interested in the physical part of the relationship than the more intimate, emotional side.

“Her desire was for him to be more romantic, to be more intimate, and not to just have sex. …” Meredith said.

“That really isn’t how things were handled in their sex life.”

Meredith was part of a four-hour discussion between the two. And Meredith said she distinctly remembers Jason’s final remark.

“His final comment was, all of this would just go away if you’d just let me have a girl on the side,” Meredith recalled.

2:35 p.m.: Back in session. Interesting moment – Judge Donald Stephens just told the jury not to consume alcohol at lunch.

He said he’d never had to tell a jury that before, but that there were some incidents involving that during jury selection, and those jurors were dismissed.

Meredith Fisher is now testifying again. She just told the jury that Jason Young had overcorrected while driving, and had an accident. Michelle was in the car, and later had a “medical abortion” becuase the baby inside her had stopped developing.

12:52 p.m.: Meredith Fisher just described the layout of the house. You can see it on the poster produced by the prosecution.

She said she had a good relationship with Jason, and a very close one with Michelle, especially as she got older. Adn she said she loved Cassidy, their daughter.

“I moved down here the day she was born and fell in love with her,” she said.

Tearing up, Meredith said Cassidy called her “Emmie.”

“It was a poor attempt for her to call me ‘Auntie Em,’ like the ‘Wizard of Oz,’” she said. “Emmie is what stuck.”

Judge Donald Stephens stopped the proceedings for lunch at 1:00 p.m. with Meredith still on the stand.

The trial will resume at 2:30 p.m.

12:40 p.m.: Meredith Fisher, the younger sister of Michelle Fisher, is on the stand. Much of the testimony so far has been the back story – how Michelle got pregnant and she and Jason decided to get married as soon as possible, how the marriage was set to not interfere with an N.C. State football game, how Meredith agreed to move to Raleigh for a year to help with child care.

11:38 a.m.: Defense attorney Mike Klinkosum is addressing the jury now. And he just put forth the essence of his case.

* He told the jury that there were two sets of footprints in Michelle Young’s bedroom and the footprints have never been positively identified to any shoes that Jason Young owned.

* He told the jury that fingerprints in the room remain unidentified.

* He said that the DNA on Michelle Young’s jewelry box remains unidentified.

* He said “not one drop of blood” was found in his car and that “not one hair” was found in his hotel room in Virginia.

“This case has never been solved, ladies and gentleman, and Jason Young did not murder his wife and his unborn child,” Klinkosum said.

Klinkosum admitted Young committed many acts of boorish behavior.

“I am not here to tell you Jason Young was a good husband. He was far from it,” Klinkosum said.

“You are going to hear he acted like an obnoxious jerk,” Klinkosum said. But he added, “We don’t convict people of murder because they sometimes act like jerks.”

Klinkosum said a conviction requires solid evidence, which does not exist in this case.

11:14 a.m.: The voice of prosecutor Becky Holt rose in particular when describing Jason Young’s actions after the murder of Michelle. He never cooperated with police, she said, and never helped with the investigation and never checked in on it.

“A man whose wife has been brutally murdered, in his home, does not call to say, what is your investigation reveal? What is going on?

“You’ll learn in this case that Linda Fisher, and Meredith Fisher, constantly called law enforcement. What do you know? What have you find out? What is your investigation showing?”

She noted that Jason Young gave up custody of his daughter rather than be deposed in a civil suit. 

“He did finally take the stand in the first trial, as she noted, “1,693 days after his wife’s murder,” she said.

She closed her opening statement by saying, 

“Jason Young is responsible for the murder of Michelle Young,” she said. “He is guillty of first-degree murder.”

10:58 a.m.: Holt repeating to the jury facts of the case with the preface, “You will learn …”

You will learn “some awfully strange events happened at the hotel.”

A door was propped open. A camera was moved. Jason Young changed clothes and went outside. A camera was moved again. 

And she just told the jury how investigators worked their way to Hillside, Va., where Jason Young had stayed, and happened to find a gas station in King, N.C., where a clerk claimed Young had been there.

“The reason the clerk remembered him was because he was so angry,” Holt said.

Holt said Jason was angry because the clerk insisted he give her money or a credit card before pumping gas.

“He was angry,” she said. “He cussed her.”

10:51 a.m.: Holt tells the jury about the scene from the morning of Nov. 3. Michelle’s sister, Meredith Fisher, came to the house that day because Jason Young had asked her to get some paperwork for a Coach bag in his office.

“What she discovered when she got to the Birchleaf house was horrific,” Holt said. “She found her sister in her bedroom having been beat to death. She found her niece hiding under the covers in the master bedroom.

“She found little footprints in blood. She found them around Michelle’s head. She saw them as she was coming up the stairs in Cassidy’s bathroom. She found baby dolls. A baby doll by Michelle’s head.

“And she heard Cassidy say, ‘Mommy’s got boo boos.’”

10:47 a.m.: Prosecutor Holt went through Jason Young’s infidelities point by point with the jury.

10:26 a.m.: Prosecutor Becky Holt is on the offensive with her opening statement. In the first trial, she seemed unprepared when Young took the stand.

Young was convincing enough then – at least to some jurors – that a re-trial was necessary.

This time, Holt opened with a line of attack to address that. She drew a sharp line between Jason and Michelle Young in their marriage.

“She was the planner, the organizer, the type A personality, the hard worker, the one who strove in her job to meet jobs. The accountant. The sometimes uptight personality,” Holt said.

“He was the free spirit, the adventure lover. Irresponsibile. Immature. The life of a party. The jokester. The salesman.

She emphasized “salesman” with an ominous tone, one sure to send a message to the jury that you can’t fully believe what he said.

Holt went on to say that Michelle was moving into a more permanent, settled marriage life, one that emphasized the family.

“She wanted the home. She wanted the family,” Holt said.

“Jason on the other hand was resistant.”

Holt said of Jason,“He was stuck in the college life.

“He would go to parties. He would get drunk.”

He wanted to out with the guys and didn’t emphasize the family enough, Michelle felt, Holt told the jury.

“That became an increasing course of friction between them,” Holt said.

10:09 a.m.: Judge Donald Stephens is going through firm instructions to the jury. 

“Don’t make any final conclusions in your mind until you have heard all the evidence in the case and you retire to deliberate,” he said.

Stephens was emphatic on this point – don’t make any decisions early.

He also explained, and again in emphatic terms, that the fact that Jason Young is accused doesn’t mean he is guilty. The state of North Carolina, Stephens said firmly, must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Young is guilty.

9:52 a.m.: Jurors are being called to their seats to get ready for the trial. Twelve jurors are now seated and there are four alternates, Judge Donald Stephens told the court.

9:38 a.m.: Court is back in session for Jason Young’s retrial. Right now, the court is looking to get jurors seated and ready.

Prosecutors said during the first trial that Young had time to drive back from Virginia, kill Michelle, and return to cover his tracks.

You can keep track of the trial right here on nbc17.com where we will be live streaming and live blogging every day of the trial.

Article source: Source

Bookmark and Share

Photo: Sun News Publishing

Only foolish women let their husband
stray–Linda Ikeji
By Samuel Olatunji
Sunday, December
19
,
2010

At 29, model, and businesswoman, Linda Ikeji has packaged enough
into her life to make her one of the most desirable ladies . Linda
is not satisfied. She still wants more. In this interview with Samuel
Olatunji , she parts the curtain to let us have a peek into her
life. Excerpt…

What has been your staying power in the industry?
(Chuckles) How come I have refused to go? It’s because I’m
not meant to go. I’m meant to be here. I have other things
that I want to accomplish in my life. My modelling days are over
, so I am moving on from there to something else. Basically, I still
have other things I want to accomplish in life. That is why I am
still around.

What do you mean by the modelling days are over? You don’t
modelling anymore?

I’m still into modelling but not as a model . I now work behind
the scene. I run a modelling agency.

What if you’re offered a mouth-watering modelling
contract?

I’ll take it but unfortunately, they don’t pay models
well in Nigeria so I can’t be part of that directly.

In your eight years of modelling, what were the pleasant
moments?

Everything was good. It was quite memorable in a way. I modelled
for all the big designers at a time. I did a few TV commercials,
did billboards, all kinds of stuff. I enjoyed myself. I met people,
everything was good.
Modelling in Nigeria is not that big, so I can’t really say
it was spectacular. I just did great shows, met great people, and
that’s it. I made some money from a deal with MTN in 2002
and bought my first guitar. I was 21 when I got my first car, and
I did a few other jobs that yielded a lot of money with which I
started my business.

So why did you say modelling is not big business in Nigeria?
Modelling is not serious business in Nigeria, because people don’t
take models seriously . They’re not regarded as celebrities
. You don’t have models on the cover of any magazine here.
Models don’t make good money and they are not appreciated.
People believe that every Tom, Dick and Harry can be models. They
say something like, any fine girl can be a model so why should I
pay attention to you? For instance, if I should come to you and
say pay me N700,000 for a modelling job, you will say why should
I pay you that when my sister is more beautiful? Why shouldn’t
I engage my sister and pay her N50,000? People don’t really
appreciate models that much because they are not paid much. They
are not like Genevieve Nnaji.

But you made money, you made a name, you’ve been
on the cover of several magazines?

Well there are exceptions I guess. Even at the early stages, I went
beyond modelling. I started producing pageants when I was 19. I
did that while I was in school. People knew me for that even before
they knew me as a model. I was producing events including fashion
shows even when I was still modelling.

Why did you start fending for yourself at 19?
I have always been independent. I actually started modelling at
17 even before I was admitted into the university. So I started
making money at that age. I always wanted to be my own person ,
doing my own thing. I have always known that I wanted to be my own
woman, so at 17, I was lucky to be able to get the opportunity to
make money and take care of myself.

What about your parents?
My parents are alive. They didn’t need to give me money anymore
because anytime they asked if I needed money , I said no don’t
worry, I have my own money and I enjoyed doing that. If you have
money, you can do anything you want with it. You don’t have
to explain to anybody why. I really enjoyed it ,so I didn’t
bother them anymore. They have other children to take care of, so
I just removed myself from the list.

So why didn’t you attempt acting?
Acting? No I was never interested in acting. Funny enough, I think
I went to one or two auditions in those days, but after a while
when I saw the whole thing, I just walked away and focused on modelling.

Are you fulfilled?
I’m not. There are so many things I have not done yet. So
many things I have not yet accomplished, but thankfully, I am not
that old. Very soon, I will get them done.

What things haven’t you done yet?
I want to give back to the society. I feel like I am 10 percent
done, I haven’t done 90 per cent. That’s the way I feel.
Hopefully in another 2 years, I will accomplish another 40 to 60
percent before I turn 40. Ultimately, I would have accomplished
100 percent.

Specifically what haven’t you done?
I want to get on TV and have my own program. I’m actually
working on it right now. I’m bringing back my magazine. I
want to be in the media. That has always been my dream.

Tell me about growing up?
It was nice. I really can’t remember, but I think I was introverted.
I kept to myself very much, so it wasn’t really that exciting.
I read a lot . Maybe that is why I am now an author. I wrote a lot,
but I have a lot of siblings. When I was able to play with them,
it was fun. Despite that my childhood was quite memorable,

How many siblings do you have?
I have six siblings.

Six?
Yeah, five girls and a boy.

And you are the first?
I am actually second child in my family. The first is my elder sister..

How did you start blogging?
Let me explain. You know I told you earlier that I always wanted
to be a journalist. I loved writing . So when I was nine , I used
to do interviews with my peers. I used to interview people, read
news and stuffs like that. So when I became older and I was unable
to study mass communication, I discovered blogging through Bella
Naija.
Sometime in 2006, a friend of mine told me she read about me on
the internet and gave me the link.

That was how I discovered Bellaniaja. Bellanaija wrote about me.
I saw all the comments about me and other people’s own and
I liked it. I started going there almost every day. Somehow, I started
wondering if I could actually do it. I really felt I could do it.
I enjoyed posting news and getting feedbacks and that’s how
I started my own blog page.

You now have over 5000 fans on your blog. How did you do
it?

I’m hoping to get more over time. I guess it’s because
of my consistency . My stories are always interesting and that makes
people want to visit every time. I used to talk about myself and
put my pictures. Other people’s stories allow visitors to
air their opinions and I guess that’s why I’m able to
get many people to visit my blog .

You now get adverts too?
Yes, we just started getting them recently .I was doing it out of
passion for writing and for disseminating news and stories but now
after three years people started telling me there is money in it.
So people started asking if they could place adverts and I charge
them for doing so. It’s not much but it comes in every month
now.

Now, you are a blogger, writer, and you run an events company.
You have a lot going for you. Are you not too busy for would-be
suitors?

I beg forget that one. Which man? I’m not so busy that I can’t
make room for a man. Some people are busier than I am.

But you know Bukky Wright had an interview with Sunday Sun too
and said men are afraid of successful women?
I think men are chasing successful women now. Most men are looking
for women who will complement their efforts financially and otherwise.
They are looking for women who can take care of themselves at home,
who can contribute to the family. I had a friend who said he had
two girls he was considering for marriage. One was a student and
the other is a banker.

He asked which he should choose. I said go for the one you love
and he said I love the student but why should I marry a student
that I will be taking care of when I can also marry the banker?
I think times have changed and men are looking for women who are
already successful or with potentials to make money. Women who can
contribute or even help them.. I think if you find a young girl
who is very rich and not married, trust me she is not married because
she has not found her kind of man. It’s not because there
are no men.

Take someone like me, I get overtures from men regularly, but I
haven’t found my choice. So men chase women who have money
a lot because they want someone who can help them or at least complement
their efforts or at least assist them. You know, not someone that
will be dependent on them to do their hair, to buy recharge cards
and all that. Most young boys don’t have time for that.

Now that you are a bit successful, do you get more toasters than
before?
I get more toasters now than before. Yeah, but my problem
is that I tease them. So, I don’t know maybe the older you
get the more you start thinking about self and I have this standard
that I’ve set. I just have to be happy. I’m so particular
about happiness. That’s why I am still giving myself time
to become successful.

But people often say that Nigerians are the happiest people.
Are you saying men are unable to make ladies happy?

I don’t mean it that way. I mean like my own happiness. Finding
somebody who makes you happy is not about Nigerian men or something
but it’s necessary that you find your own soul mate. Without
that, you can’t have a good relationship and I am happy even
without a man. If I’m happy with my relationships, being happy
with my husband is a different thing.

What specifically are you looking for?
A person who is good for me, a person that is perfect for me.

What can a man do to make you happy?
He doesn’t have to do anything. He just has to be himself.
There are six billion people and choosing one person out of this
number means that the person is someone you want to be with. Someone
who for some reason, you cannot explain how he makes you happy.
When you are with such people, they don’t have to say anything
to make you happy. You’re just happy being in their presence.

Do you have a specific timeframe within which you wish to get married?

No, absolutely not. When God gives me a husband, I will marry.

Don’t you think you are getting old and people can
start talking about you?

I don’t care what people think about me. When God is ready
for me, He’ll give me a husband. I can marry at any age depending
on when God gives him to me.

What do you do to maintain your stunning figure?
It’s natural. I don’t do anything. I don’t exercise,
I don’t eat a specific food. It’s just natural.

What’s the difference between love and infatuation?
You know it’s very difficult to distinguish because a lot
of people are infatuated and they think it’s love. For me,
the best way I can answer this is that, love is a real thing. Infatuation
is when you think it’s a real thing. Love is without any doubt.
With love, you can overcome anything but the infatuated takes into
consideration wrongdoing easily.

What’s the difference between love and sex?
There’s a big difference. You can have sex with someone you
don’t love. It’s a totally different thing. Love has
to do with emotions while sex is physical.

But people often say unless a woman is a prostitute, she
doesn’t give her body to any man except she loves him. What’s
your take on that?

Yeah, women rarely give their bodies to men they don’t love.
Except you are loose or you are seeking favours or whatever . But
most times, women are of high moral standing with God. If they don’t
love you, you can’t touch them and I’m one of these
women. If I don’t love you, you can never touch me.

What should we expect from you in 2011?
A lot. I have a lot to do in 2011. I am expanding my brand, expanding
my online business, expanding my magazine, going on television.

Can you date a married man?
Over my dead body.

What’s the big deal about dating a married man?
Why would I do it? It’s silly to date another woman’s
husband.

Some women believe men will cheat no matter what you do
to satisfy them?

That’s for ladies who let their husbands go out cheating.
I am not one of those .

You are almost certain that your man will not cheat aren’t
you?

He probably will, but it’s going to be so unusual of him.
That is until it happens. I never thought about it. Never! Though
men are prone to cheating, it’s how you deal with it that
matters.

How
to Give Your Woman Earth-Shaking Orgasms. Click Here!

Make
N450,000 Online Monthly. Click Here

How
to Easily Get Any Woman You Want. Click Here!

Win
Big with Online Football Betting. Click Here to Register

Article source: Source

Bookmark and Share

What’s the alternative to ‘job killer’ unemployment insurance?

Jessica Onstrom,

I understand your frustration. I too was out of work for a year, after 20 years in the same line of work. I made a point of sending out a minimum of 2 resumes a day and making sure they were jobs that I was well qualified for, in that year I had exactly 2 interviews. It wasn’t until I dumbed down my resume that I got the second interview and a job, at pretty much an entry level position making substantially less than I was accustomed to.

I would imagine your first problem, like mine, is your resume. Touting 40 years experience tells an employer two things, #1, your approximate age, and all that goes with hiring someone of your age and #2, they can probably hire someone cheaper based on your overqualifications.

Finding a job these days is not like it was before. In the past you would call, set up an interview, sell yourself in person. Today, you see something online, you email a resume with hopefully a well worded cover letter, and you wait… There is no feedback, nothing to tell you why you were not even worthy of some kind of response, just waiting and hoping. Resumes were important in the past, but you could answer any questions a perspective employer had regarding any holes they may be concerned about in that interview, not today.

Take a good hard look at your resume.

As to the unemployment benefits extensions and why they are bad to continue to extend… Well, first off, unlike you, there are plenty of people just fine with what they are getting on unemployment, they do not even bother looking for a job, this is an issue. I worked with a temp agency before the last extension, they were crushed when the extension went through because that meant that they would not have the people to fill jobs that they had available. Many people are unwilling to work for just a few dollars per hour more than what they are getting on unemployment. That is just a reality. The real unfortunate truth is that it usually does not make economic sense for them to work for a dollar or two per hour than what they are receiving on UE. They take a temp job for three months, job ends, their UE is now based off their income from the last job, meaning a cut in benefits, that is an issue.

I dont think that anyone knows what the absolute answer is. Those on the left will say extend UE benefits in perpetuity until everyone has a job. Some on the right will say cut them off after 6 months. I think that the true solution is to create an environment where business flourishes and hires folks. Sadly, that is not the environment created here in Oregon, and with the new incoming governor, it doesnt look to change.

Article source: Source

Bookmark and Share

If you must read only a few things today, please select from the following:

I support and endorse Sharon Sund for US Congress. Sharon will represent the Third District in Minnesota.

For years, the Third District, in which I live, was represented by a moderate Republican, Jim Ramstad. Though I never voted for him, it was not all that annoying that he was in Congress because, as I say, he was moderate. Ramstad was pro choice, suppored stem cell research, he was not anti science and he was pro gay rights (but did not support gay marriage). I mention all this because it should reflect the electorate of the 3rd District which he represented.

Around the time of his retirement, of course, Republicans were busy jettisoning their moderates. When the seat became open two elections back, the Democrats put up a person who could be thought of as a moderate Democrat, and in particular, as a veteran Marine with experience in Iraq, and a lawyer, a candidate who could appeal to the sorts of republicans that must have been electing Ramstad since 1990. That was Ashwin Madia, and I worked for his campaign as much as I had time for, canvassing, phone banking, and blogging. Madia was a great guy but for reasons which I will lay out in a moment, he lost that election despite the coattails of Barach Obama and Al Franken, also running that year.

Madia was defeated by Eric Paulsen, coming from the Minnesota House. Paulsen is a Bush-Bachmann Republican. He opposes a good health care system, voted agains tthe American Clean Energy and Security Act, against all of the economic emergency bills that were proposed a couple of years back, he is uniformly against all gay rights and is in favor of discrimination against women. How did such a person win against Madia in this moderate district?

There are probably two or three reasons. First, Madia was a great guy and his positions were in line with what one would think the district would support, but he was not a dynamic presence on the stage, and therefore no matter what he said during debates and public performances, he did not pick up support during those events. Second, Paulsen matches the district more than one might have thought. Even though Ramstat was re-elected again and again, he also ran against virtually no opposition again and again. When I first moved to the district, and asked around, I discovered that most people didn’t even know if he was a Republican or a Democrat, or what his positions were or, in some cases, if he was a state or federal Representative. Putting it another way, there hadn’t been an election for office of the Third Congressional District since 1990. Third, the above mentioned coat tails were not as long as one might have thought. Remember, Franken only barely beat Coleman, having run what Franken himself calls “The most efficient election to the Senate ever.”

Once Paulsen was in place, he showed himself to be a follower. Mainly, a follower of Michele Bachmann. When his first re-election campaign came up, and he was opposed by Jim Meffert, I did an analysis of Paulsen’s voting record and found that it was almost exactly identical to Michele Bachmann’s (see: Who is Erik Paulsen, anyway?). I think that situation has not changed since the, though it became difficult to compare any one’s voting record to Bachmann because she stopped casting votes to go run for President.

Meffert, running against Paulsen two years ago, was also a moderate candidate, and I think he may have been put forward by the party for similar reasons as Madia; Ramstat was moderate, thus the district is moderate, thus put up a moderate. However, now that this strategy has failed twice in a row, it is clearly time to consider a different option.

And that option is clearly Sharon Sund.

Sund is not a moderate. She is not wishy washy or equivocating on any of the key issues.

She supports investment in education, opposes the unfunded federal mandate, and would never support the teaching of anti-science or bad science in the science classroom. Sund wants to increase Pell Grant funding, expand loan forgiveness, and supports maximizing STEM funding. Her energy and environment policy is pro-environmental and pro-jobs, supporting investment in green energy, and tax incentives for green technology development. At the same time she wants to redirect fossil fuel subsidies to develop green economies, invest in infrastructure, and repatriate jobs via tax incentives.

Sandra_Sund.jpgSharon is unabashedly pro LGBTQ. She has made a campaign promise to co-sponsor the repeal of DOMA, supports marriage equality, social fairness and equality, and extends this to partner immigration rights.

Unlike Paulsen, Sharon Sund will vote for the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, she supports federal funding for Planned Parenthood, is Pro Choice and supports funding of Medicare for parents, children, and others, and supports reinvestment in Head Start and increasing tax credits and deductions for Child Care expenses.

One of the things that attracts me most to Sharon Sund’s candidacy is her position on science. Sharon is actually a scientist, holding degrees in science related fields. She did research and development work on a battery used in windmill-based electricity generation. She supports STEM funding and excellence in science education. You can check out her positions on science and other issues on her web site, but I’ve heard from her directly on these issues and I’m very positively impressed with her enthusiasm regarding the importance of science in policy. Some time in the near future I want to ask her about the Science Pledge and see if she’ll sign on to it. I’m guessing yes. I’ll let you know.

Here’s the thing: Sharon Sund is a clearly progressive candidate who overtly foregrounds science and related economic, educational, health, and social policy informed by science. I really could not have asked for a better candidate running in my district. I hope that you feel the same way. Running moderates in the Third District has not been an effective strategy against a Michele Bachmann clone. The choice has not been clear enough. Name recognition and machine politics have given an advantage to the Republican candidate, and this advantage is only getting stronger. Sund is a progressive who represents the views of many people in this district. She is a pro-science person, and many people who live in this district are in science related jobs (as is the case with all of the Minnesota suburubs). She is a pro-education candidate, and her district is probably the most pro-education district in the state. Sharon Sund can gain support a moderate could have never gained here. And with that support she can actually win this race and allow Minnesota to shift its delegation to a more progressive stance.

If you are not a resident of the Third District of Minnesota, I still need you to do something. I need you to Click Here and donate $10 to Sharon’s campaign. Having her in Congress will benefit you even if you live in Peoria. For that matter, it will benefit you even if you live in Tokyo. So send Yen!

If you ARE a resident of the Third District of Minnesota, then you MUST CLICK HERE and donate $100 to Sharon’s campaign, AND you must volunteer for her.

If Sharon Sund is elected to Congress, the number of scientists in the House of Representatives of the United States will increase by about 15%. You can help make this happen!

Article source: Source

Bookmark and Share

Are new unemployment figures a boost for Obama?

Friday’s good news on the economy – an unemployment rate that dropped to 8.3 percent in January as the economy added 243,000 jobs – might have caused the White House staff to do cartwheels. If you’re going to get blamed when things are rough, why not celebrate when they go well?

Skip to next paragraph

  • U.S. Economy
  • Economic Indicators
  • Labor Market
  • Lagging Economic Indicators
  • Unemployment Rate
  • Job Growth
  • 2012 Election

But that would have been behind closed doors, and the official response was more measured.

“These numbers will go up and down in the coming months, and there’s still far too many Americans who need a job or need a job that pays better than the one they have now,” President Obama said. “But the economy is growing stronger.”

The Monitor’s Weekly News Quiz for Jan. 27-Feb. 3, 2012

Came the quick retort from Mitt Romney, front-runner in the GOP race to try and unseat Obama: “Not so fast, Mr. President. This is the 36th straight month with unemployment above the red line your own administration drew. The real unemployment rate is over 15 percent. Mr. President, America has also had enough of your kind of help.”

(Romney’s “real unemployment rate over 15 percent” apparently includes the underemployed and those who’ve gotten discouraged and stopped looking.)

So the political question is: How much can Obama be credited with what looks to be an economic turnaround – if indeed that’s what we’re seeing?

On ABC’s “This Week” Sunday, Larry Summers, Obama’s former economic adviser who served as Treasury Secretary in the Clinton administration, put a positive spin on the new employment figures.

“Unlike many of the favorable past reports, if you look beneath the surface of this one, almost every indicator within it is favorable,” he said. “The growth is mostly from the private sector. The alternative survey, the household survey, suggested 500,000 or more jobs were created. The revisions of past months were favorable. People are working a longer week. Paychecks are going up. The number of vacancies, firms looking for work, are going up.”

Blogging in the New Yorker, John Cassidy points out that if January’s rate of hiring continues, within a few months the jobless rate will drop below 7.8 per cent – where it stood when Obama took office.

“At that point, it will be tough for Mitt Romney to stand up and say the President’s policies have made the recession worse,” Cassidy writes. “And it will be impossible for Republicans to deny that things are getting better.”

Republican congressional leaders don’t deny that the employment situation is improving. They just think it would be better if they were in charge – or at least if Obama would urge Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to take up the jobs bills that have passed in the House with bipartisan support.

Political prognosticators say the improving employment news gave a bump to Obama’s standing in the 2012 presidential race.

The Intrade prediction market now gives him a 57 percent chance of being re-elected. Romney has a 38 percent chance of preventing that, according to Intrade.

“While a month of 250,000 jobs added isn’t sufficient to get the president re-elected, it was necessary,” writes Sean Trende at Real Clear Politics. “We should realize that this isn’t exactly the 1.1 million jobs added in September 1983, but it is absolutely an important first step for Obama to get back into the 2012 race.”

Still, in a mock election Obama leads Romney by a scant 2.2 percent in the Real Clear Politics average of recent polls.

And in an article titled “Why Obama should be worried,” Jim Vandehei at Politico warns against “Pollyanna punditry.”

“There are a bunch of real-time numbers coming in that tell a much different tale,” he writes.

“There’s a new Congressional Budget Office report that shows unemployment likely to climb to nearly 9 percent by the election, there’s polling data showing Obama tied or trailing Mitt Romney in the most important swing states (and doing only marginally better against Ron Paul), and there is mounting evidence that the assumption of a decisive Obama fundraising advantage for the fall might be flat wrong,” Vandehei writes.

Over at Gallup, the polling organization reports that in just ten states and the District of Columbia do a majority of those surveyed approve of the job Obama is doing, according to monthly tracking data through 2011.

So if the White House gained a little spring in its step from the latest job figures, it needs to focus on other trends as well.

The Monitor’s Weekly News Quiz for Jan. 27-Feb. 3, 2012

Article source: Source

Bookmark and Share